천문학적인 돈을 주무르는 뉴욕의 최연소 거물 투자가 에릭 패커. 그의 하루는 뉴욕 도심의 초호화 리무진에서 시작 된다. 때는 뉴욕 세계 공황이 극에 달하는 시점, 에릭 패커는 자신의 능력을 과신하며 위안화에 배팅한다. 성공 강박증에 시달리는 그는 절대 사무실로 들어가지 않고, 리무진에서만 관계자들을 만난다. 하루 동안 리무진을 찾아오는 회계전문가, 투자전문가, 경제전문가, 큐레이터, 보디가드, 그리고 그의 부인까지 에릭 패커가 가진 고민의 어떤 것도 해결해 주지 못한다. 결국 위안화 폭락으로 인해 그는 파산 위기에 처하게 되고 이혼까지 당한다. 이미 세계 공황 속에 뒤죽박죽이 되어버린 뉴욕. 시민들은 쥐를 잡아서 화폐와 비교하는 시위를 하고, 에릭 패커를 문제의 근원이라 지목하는데…
런타임: 109 분
출시 날짜 2012-05-25
예산: $20,500,000.00
수익: $6,063,556.00
웹사이트: Link
태그 행: 욕망과 타락의 도시 뉴욕, 1%의 삶이 펼쳐진다! 누구보다 특별한 하이클래스의 세계
생산 회사:
생산 국가:
장르:
I really enjoyed this Cronenberg film. Though my favourite films of his are the incredible ones he did in my teens, during the 80's ('Videodrome', 'The Dead Zone' and 'The Fly' are nothing short of outstanding, and works that no one else could have come up with), he's really been thinking outside of the box for the past decade (even for a consistently interesting creature such as he), and it's only been recently, with both Sarah Polley and Denis Villeneuve emerging as vital directors, that his ranking as the greatest Canadian director ever has even had suitable competition for comparison. I remembered when this came out, and I believe a critic from 'The Globe and Mail' interviewed Cronenberg at its opening at Cannes, and he was almost apologetic about using Pattinson. It sounded like he didn't want to have to direct him. He made the excuse that he couldn't get funding for his projects from North America anymore, which is a dirty rotten shame, and had to go to Europe and Asia any time he wanted to make a film in order to have it bankrolled, and the Japanese insisted on star power to put moviegoers in the seats, and said there'd only be financial backing if Cronenberg directed Pattinson. This was my first experience watching the actor's work, and he did a fine job, no problem. The supporting cast was strong, with many of my favourite character actors of late, such as Paul Giamatti and Jay Baruchel. The script, co-written by Cronenberg, was a strong statement about just how out of touch the very rich are with the other 99% of us. I docked my mark by 1/10 because I was pissed off that Cronenberg degraded one of the finest actresses of our lifetime, Juliette Binoche here. I can't even talk about it. It was as difficult for me to tolerate as Spike Lee having Christopher Plummer call Jodie Foster something awful in the otherwise excellent 'Inside Man'. Lee's off my Christmas card list for sure this year, but Cronenberg being a fellow Canadian (I bet you thought I was going to say white, hahaha), I'll be less angry. But he better look over his shoulder if he tries something like THAT again. I was THAT close to crossing HIM off my Christmas card list too... I also remember from the time the film came out, an article and rating on the film (I think it was 'The Globe and Mail' as well, and by the same critic who had earlier interviewed him), saying that when he watched it, he watched a few teenage girls leaving the theatre (most probably because Pattinson was in it), saying it was the worst movie they had ever seen. That's the only evidence you need that this is a fine movie, well worth your time.